Contains twenty-six essays in which various authors debate issues related to animal experimentation, discussing animal rights, the ethics of animal experimentation, methods of experimentation, and other related topics.
Content Note
Animals have rights / Tom Regan -- Animals do not have rights / Ilana Mercer -- Animals are equal to humans / Matt Ball and Jack Norris -- Animals are not equal to humans / Josie Appleton -- Animal rights activists are terrorists / Alex Epstein -- Animal rights activists are not terrorists / Will Potter -- Animal researchers should not be bullied by animal rights terrorists / Fiona Fox -- Animal experimentation is ethical / Adrian R. Morrison -- Animal experimentation is unethical / David Thomas -- Using primates in medical experimentation is justifiable / Scientific Steering Committee of the European Commission -- Using primates in medical experimentation is unjustifiable / John Gray -- The animal experimentation debate has reached a moral deadlock / Peter Singer -- The moral deadlock concerning animal experimentation can be broken / Patrick Bateson -- Animal experimentation is vital to medical research / American Physiological Society -- Animal experimentation is not vital to medical research / Christopher Anderegg, et al. -- Drug testing on animals is beneficial / Jennifer A. Hurley -- Drug testing on animals is not beneficial / Kathy Archibald -- Microchip technologies could make drug testing on animals unnecessary / David H. Freedman -- The risks of animal-to-human transplants outweigh the benefits / Joyce D'Silva -- The benefits of animal-to-human transplants outweigh the risks / A physician, interviewed by Gale Scott -- Genetically modified animals are beneficial to medicine / Alexandre Fouassier and Manufacturing Chemist -- Genetically modified animals are not beneficial to medicine / Animal Aid -- Animal cloning is worthwhile / Marie A. Di Berardino -- Animal cloning is unnecessary / Wayne Pacelle.