Search Results: Returned 7 Results, Displaying Titles 1 - 7
-
-
-
-- Miranda versus Arizona and the rights of the accusedc2006, Enslow Publishers Call No: 345.73 056 Availability:1 of 1 At Location(s)Table of contents only Series Title: Debating Supreme Court decisionsSummary Note: Examines the Supreme Court case involving Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona in 1966 that led to the "Miranda" warnings and the rights of accused persons according to the Fifth Amendment.
-
-
-- Miranda versus Arizona1994., Juvenile, Enslow Publishers Call No: 347.73 RIL Availability:1 of 1 At Location(s) Series Title: Landmark Supreme Court casesSummary Note: Examines the arguments behind this 1966 Supreme Court case that resulted in the ruling that police must advise the accused of their rights.
-
-
-
-- Miranda versus Arizonac2007., Juvenile, Compass Point Books Call No: 345.73 BURGAN Availability:1 of 1 At Location(s)
-
-
-- Miranda versus Arizonac2007., Juvenile, Compass Point Books Call No: 345.73 BUR Availability:1 of 1 At Location(s) Series Title: Snapshots in history
-
-
-
-- Miranda versus Arizonac2007, Juvenile, Compass Point Books Call No: 345.73 056 Availability:1 of 1 At Location(s) Series Title: Snapshots in history
-
-
By Wice, Paul B1996., Juvenile, Franklin Watts Call No: 347.73 WIC Availability:1 of 1 At Location(s) Series Title: Historic Supreme Court casesSummary Note: On June 13, 1966, a divided Supreme Court ruled that suspects must be informed of their rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to counsel, before they are questioned by police.
-
-
2006., Greenhaven Press Call No: 342.73 BILL Availability:1 of 1 At Location(s) Series Title: The Bill of RightsSummary Note: Examines the history of Americans' rights against self-incrimination, with an overview of key court rulings related to the freedom, an explanation of what freedom from self-incrimination means, and an analysis of its evolution.
